Sverdrup has scored all of our significant actions and policies (‘factors’) through a double sustainability assessment. A factor should be understood either as an impacts, a risk, or as an opportunity.

| ESRS category | Impact/risk/opportunity | Impact score* | Financial score** | Sustainability total score*** |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Climate change mitigation | Optimized transportation | 19.2 | 4.8 | 9.2 |
| Clean power from the grid | 19.2 | 0.8 | 1.5 | |
| Global transport/logistics manager | 18 | 21.6 | 38.9 | |
| 100% steel recycling | 50 | 6.4 | 32 | |
| Reduced packaging volume | 14.4 | 19.2 | 27.7 | |
| Compressing machine | 20 | 0.8 | 1.6 | |
| 100% sort separation of waste | 32 | 8 | 25.6 | |
| Sustainable business travel and digital meetings | 9.6 | 19.2 | 18.4 | |
| Cut building energy use | 19.2 | 4.8 | 9.2 | |
| Solar cell panels on rooftops | 3.2 | 2.4 | 0.8 | |
| Pollution | Metal dust in production area | 12.8 | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Wood dust in production area | 9.6 | 0.8 | 0.8 | |
| MCE filter | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.1 | |
| Diesel and electrical forklifts | 2.6 | 4.8 | 1.3 | |
| Transport: Trucks Euro 6 or electric truck | 16 | 19.2 | 30.7 | |
| Biodiversity / ecosystems | Leased storage buildings and offices (soil sealing and land degradation) | 3.2 | 4.8 | 1.5 |
| Circular economy | Metal scrap recirculation | 6 | 12 | 7.2 |
| General waste sort separation | 8 | 12 | 9.6 | |
| Own workforce | Job stability for employees | 20 | 12 | 24 |
| Regulated work and rest | 20 | 12 | 24 | |
| Breach of working time (risk) | 3.8 | 2.4 | 0.9 | |
| Economic security for employees | 12 | 28 | 33.6 | |
| Good working environment | 19.2 | 12 | 23 | |
| Exposed working env. (risk) | 7.7 | 2.4 | 1.9 | |
| Employee involvement | 16 | 12 | 19.2 | |
| Workers’ rights | 24 | 28 | 67.2 | |
| Well-being measures | 12 | 8 | 9.6 | |
| Equal pay | 2 | 5.5 | 1.1 | |
| Continuous learning measures | 3.2 | 4.8 | 1.5 | |
| Workers in the value chain | Compliance with EU Mobility package | 24 | 6.4 | 15.4 |
| Social dialogue, freedom of association, health and safety measures, diversity protection etc. | 8 | 2.4 | 1.9 | |
| Business conduct | Internal policies (upholding values, norms and behaviour) | 12 | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| European partners and producers | 16 | 12 | 19.2 |
* Assessment 1: Impact score
The first sustainability score – IMPACT – measures how important
the particular factor is for the company’s external footprint.
** Assessment 2: Financial score
The second score – FINANCIAL – measures how important the factor
is for Sverdrup’s own financial operations.
*** Sustainability total score (0–100)
Impact × financial / 10